Friday, July 9, 2010

વેઇટરમાંથી બન્યા હોટેલિયર સુરિન્દર અરોરા

વેઇટરમાંથી બન્યા હોટેલિયર સુરિન્દર અરોરા

Prakash Biyani, Strategy and Success
 
બ્રિટનમાં વસતા મૂળ ભારતીય ઉદ્યોગપતિ સુરિન્દર અરોરાએ નવો વ્યવસાય શોધ્યો અને તેઓ ઈંગ્લેન્ડના એવિએશન ઉદ્યોગના સૌથી મોટા હોટેલિયર બન્યા. ‘સન્ડે ટાઈમ્સે’ બ્રિટનમાં વસતા ૪૦૦ ટોપ એશિયન કુબેરોની યાદીમાં તેમનો સમાવેશ કર્યો.

strategysuccess_288નાથન નામના એક દરિયાઈ પક્ષીએ પરંપરાગત માન્યતાઓનું કોચલું તોડીને પોતાના ઝૂંડમાંનાં પક્ષીઓ કરતાં આકાશમાં વધુ ને વધુ ઊંચે ઊડવાનો નિર્ણય કર્યો. ત્યારે ઝૂંડના સભ્યોએ ટકોર કરતાં કહ્યું, ‘વધું ઊંચે ઊડવાના ઊધામા ન કર. આટલી ઊંચાઈએ હજુ સુધી કોઈ પહોંચ્યું નથી.’ જોનાથને આ શિખામણ સામે આંખ આડા કાન કરીને મુશ્કેલીઓ સામે બાથ ભીડી. લક્ષ્ય સુધી પહોંચવા માટે તે ઊંચે ને ઊંચે ને ઊડતું ગયું. ત્યાં તેની મુલાકાત ચિયાંગ સાથે થઈ. તેણે જોનાથનની હિંમત વધારી અને પ્રોત્સાહન આપ્યું. જોનાથને ધ્યેયપ્રાપ્તિની ધગશ અને દ્રઢ સંકલ્પ થકી મુશ્કેલીઓ પાર પાડીને સફળતા મેળવી. એકદિવસ જોનાથન જ્યાં ક્યારેય કોઈ દરિયાઈ પક્ષી નહોતું પહોંચ્યું ત્યાં પહોંચી ગયું.

ભારતીય ઉદ્યોગ જગતમાં ‘રિટેલના રાજા’ ગણાતા કિશોર બિયાણીને ઉપર વર્ણવેલી ‘જોનાથન લિવિંગ્સ્ટન સીગલ’ લઘુકથા ખૂબ ગમે છે. આ વાર્તાનો ટૂંકસાર છે કે સૌથી અલગ વિચારો, ઊંચું વિચારો અને વિચારોને અમલમાં મૂકવાનું જોખમ ખેડો. અડચણોથી ગભરાઈ ન જાવ અને આગળ વધો તો સફળતા મળશે.

બ્રિટનમાં વસતા મૂળ ભારતીય ઉદ્યોગપતિ સુરિન્દર અરોરાએ નવો વ્યવસાય શોધ્યો અને તેઓ ઈંગ્લેન્ડના એવિએશન ઉદ્યોગના સૌથી મોટા હોટેલિયર બન્યા. સન્ડે ટાઈમ્સે બ્રિટનમાં વસતા ૪૦૦ ટોપ એશિયન કુબેરોની યાદી બનાવી. તેમાં ૨૨.૪૦ કરોડ પાઉન્ડની સંપત્તિ ધરાવતા ૫૨ વર્ષીય સુરિન્દર અરોરાનો સમાવેશ થયો. નવાઈની વાત તો એ છે કે ૧૩ વર્ષની વયે હિથ્રો એરપોર્ટ પર લેન્ડ કરતી વખતે સુરિન્દર અંગ્રેજી બોલી શકતા નહોતા. તેમનાં બે માતા-પિતા છે. આ અંગે તેઓ કહે છે, ‘ઈંગ્લેન્ડમાં વસતા જન્મ આપનારા મારા માતા-પિતાએ મને નિ:સંતાન માસા-માસીને દત્તક આપી દીધો. હું ૧૩ વર્ષ સુધી દત્તક માતા-પિતા પાસે પંજાબમાં રહ્યો. પછી તેમણે ૧૯૯૧માં જન્મ આપનારા માતા-પિતા પાસે મને ઈંગ્લેન્ડ પાછો મોકલી દીધો.’

સુરિન્દરને જન્મ આપનારાં માતા (જેમને તેઓ આન્ટી કહે છે) ઈંગ્લેન્ડમાં સારી રીતે ઘર ચલાવવા માટે ત્યારે ત્રણ જગ્યાએ પાર્ટટાઈમ જોબ કરતા હતાં. સુરિન્દરભાઇ લંડનમાં શાળાકીય અભ્યાસ કરતા હતા ત્યારે જ માતાએ પુત્રને કમાણીના કરવાના પાઠ ભણાવ્યા. સુરિન્દરભાઇએ બ્રિટિશ એરવેઝ ઉપરાંત વીમા કંપનીમાં એબ્બે લાઈફમાં નોકરી કરી. તેમણે હોટલમાં પાર્ટટાઈમ વેઇટરની જોબ પણ કરી. તેઓ જે હોટલમાં વેઇટર હતા એ જ હોટલના આજે તેઓ માલિક બની ગયા છે. એક ઈન્ટરવ્યૂમાં સુરિન્દરભાઇ કહે છે કે તેમને ઊંચે આકાશે ઊડવાની ઈચ્છા હતી એટલે પાઇલટનું લાયસન્સ મેળવવા માટે બ્રિટિશ એરવેઝ ટ્રેનિંગ સ્કૂલ જોઈન કરી.

પાઇલટ લાયસન્સ માટે જરૂરી ઉડ્ડયન કલાક પૂરા કર્યા પણ લાયસન્સ મળે તે પહેલાં જ ટ્રેનિંગ સ્કૂલને તાળાં લાગી ગયા. પછી તેઓ વીમા કંપનીમાં સામાન્ય સેલ્સમેનમાંથી બ્રાન્ચ મેનેજરના હોદ્દા સુધી પહોંચ્યા. નોકરીથી તેમને સંતોષ થતો નહોતો. તેઓ સ્વતંત્ર રીતે કયો વ્યવસાય કરી શકાય તેની ભાળ મેળવી રહ્યા હતા. કુટુંબની ભેગી કરેલી મૂડીમાંથી સ્થાવર મિલકતનું ખરીદ-વેચાણ કરવા લાગ્યા. આ પાર્ટટાઈમ વ્યવસાયમાં તેમને બ્રેક મળ્યો.

તેમણે જુદા જુદા ૯ મકાનમાલિકો પાસેથી હિથ્રો નજીક બિસ્માર મકાનોની એક રા‹ ખરીદી. સુરિન્દરભાઇ કહે છે, ‘બ્રિટિશ એરવેઝમાં નોકરી કરતા મને જાણવા મળ્યું કે કંપની પોતાના ક્રૂ-સ્ટાફ માટે સસ્તા ટેમ્પરરી (એક-બે રાત્રિના રોકાણ) માટેનાં મકાન શોધે છે.’ ત્યારે સુરિન્દર અરોરાએ ‘બેડ-બ્રેકફાસ્ટ’ની સુવિધાયુકત હવાઈ કર્મચારીઓને રાત્રિ રોકાણની સસ્તી અને સ્વચ્છ રહેણાંક સુવિધા પૂરી પાડવાનું નક્કી કર્યું. સુરિન્દરભાઇ અને પત્ની સુનિતાબહેને તનતોડ મહેનત કરી અને બિસ્માર મકાનોને ૩૦ બેડરૂમની હિથ્રો લોજમાં બદલી નાખ્યા. બિઝનેસનો આ આઇડિયા સફળ નીવડ્યો. બ્રિટિશ એરવેઝને આ સુવિધા કોઠે પડી ગઈ. તેણે સુરિન્દર અરોરા સાથે કરાર કર્યો. જોતજોતામાં હિથ્રો લોજની આગવી ઓળખ ઊભી થઈ. આમ હિથ્રો લોજ એર ક્રૂ સ્ટાફ માટે સૌથી સસ્તી અલ્પાવધિ પ્રવાસ રોકાણ સુવિધાનું ઉત્તમ ઠેકાણું બની ગઈ.

હિથ્રો લોજમાંથી સુરિન્દરે કમાણી કરી પછી ૧૯૯૯માં તેમણે ૩૨૫ રૂમવાળી અરોરા ઇન્ટરનેશનલ હિથ્રો હોટલ સ્થાપી અને બ્રિટિશ એરવેઝ સાથે પાંચ વર્ષનો કરાર કર્યો. ૨૦૦૧માં બ્રિટિશ એરવેઝ ઉપરાંત વર્જિન એટલાન્ટિક ક્રૂ સ્ટાફ માટે તેમણે ૧૧૯ રૂમની અરોરા ઈન્ટરનેશનલ ગેટવિક શરૂ કરી. આના માટે સુરિન્દર અરોરાએ બ્રિટિશ એરવેઝ ઉપરાંત અમેરિકન એરલાઈન્સ સાથે કરાર કર્યો. પછી એરવેઝ ઉપરાંત કોર્પોરેટ કલાયન્ટ્સ પણ પોતાના સ્ટાફના ટૂંકા ગાળાના પ્રવાસ રોકાણ માટે અરોરાનો સંપર્ક કરવા લાગ્યા.

નવા ગ્રાહક જુથની માગને પહોંચી વળવા માટે સુરિન્દરભાઇએ ૨૦૦૪માં ‘બેચલર બા‹ય’ અને ‘સમર હોલિડે’ આલ્બમ્સ માટે જાણીતા સર ક્લિફ રિચર્ડની ભાગીદારીમાં માન્ચેસ્ટરમાં ૧૪૧ રૂમની હોટલ ખરીદી. તેનું નામ ‘અરોરા ઇન્ટરનેશનલ માન્ચેસ્ટર’ રાખ્યું. સુરિન્દર અરોરા કહે છે, ‘સર ક્લિફ રિચર્ડ મારા ફકત ભાગીદાર જ નથી પણ અંગત મિત્ર પણ છે. તેઓ મારા માટે બહુ શુકનિયાળ નીવડ્યા છે. ૧૯૯૯માં અમારી પહેલી મુલાકાત હિથ્રોમાં થઈ હતી. ત્યાર પછી મારા દરેક વેન્ચરની રિબિન તેમણે જ કાપી.’

પેલી વાર્તામાં જેમ જોનાથનને ચિયાંગ મળે છે તેમ સુરિન્દરભાઈને સર ક્લિફ રિચર્ડ જેવા મિત્ર મળે છે. ૨૦૦૬માં અરોરાએ મોટો સોદો પાડ્યો. બીએએ લિંટાન એરપોર્ટ હોટલ્સ યુનિટ ટ્રસ્ટ પાસેથી ૩૯ કરોડ પાઉન્ડમાં સુરિન્દરે એરપોર્ટ સ્થિત ૯ હોટલ્સ ખરીદી. હાલમાં સુરિન્દર અને સુનિતા અરોરા બ્રિટનમાં સૌથી મોટી હોટલ શ્રૃંખલાના માલિક છે. તેમની ૧૬ હોટલ પોતાના ગ્રાહકોને ૬ હજાર બેડરૂમ્સ પૂરા પાડીને વર્ષે સરેરાશ ૬૦ મિલિયન પાઉન્ડનો બિઝનેસ કરે છે. આ હોટલ્સ બ્રિટનના સૌથી વ્યસ્ત એરપોર્ટ્સ ખાતે આવેલી છે. ગેટનિક અને સ્ટેનસ્ટેડ એરપોર્ટ્સની સૌથી મોટી હોટલ અરોરા ઈન્ટરનેશનલ છે. અરોરાની હોટલ શ્રૃખંલાનો સૌથી મોટો વિસ્તાર ૨૦૦૮માં ૬૦૫ બેડરૂમ્સની ૨૦ કરોડ પાઉન્ડની સાફીટેલ લંડન હિથ્રો છે. તે બ્રિટનની સૌથી મોટી લકઝરી એરપોર્ટ હોટલ ગણાય છે.

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Child`s Future: How to secure their dreams?

As education gets expensive by the year, worry mounts on the parents - Higher education cost is growing at a cost grossly higher than the average inflation rate applicable to a developing economy. Higher education has become a common norm in education field, funding the same could be challenging for parents.

How much to plan for?

This is an eternal dilemma, of course you weave dreams of your son/daughter becoming a doctor/engineer/entrepreneur/ sports person, but they may have their own dreams to pursue. Irrespective of what they choose to become, one thing in common is the cost involved.

For those of who started early investment have numerous options even within the gamut of `Low-risk` options. Some others would have missed the bus, but as they say it`s never too late to embark on this journey. Here is a snapshot of how one should arrive at the corpus required for your precious child`s needs.

Below table shows the corpus requirement for milestone to achieve for children.


Milestone
No. of Yrs hence
Amt as of today
Cost escalation rate
Projected Amt
Graduation
16
500,000
7.50%
1,590,397
Post-Graduation
20
800,000
7.50%
3,398,281
Marriage
22
500,000
6.50%
1,998,303
Total Corpus Requirement
6,986,981
Options:-Child Benefit Mutual FundsKey Features
> Gift Plan - It`s an investment of a longer duration varying between 5-18 years and has higher allocation to equities.

> Study Plan - It`s targeted at students who would require money in a shorter duration of 3-5 years, and thus invest large part in debt instruments.

> Exclusively designed to payout out sizable chunks of amount.

> Some funds have lock-in of three years or more.

> These are essentially hybrid funds with a decent % exposed only into debt instruments.

Traditional / Guaranteed Child Plan
Key Features
> Money Back - Payouts are at relevant milestones of child.

> Endowment - One -time payout.

> Guaranteed Plan - Stipulated amount is already guaranteed - No surprises!

> Bonus Linked Plan - Depending on company`s performance, bonus will be declared.
ULIP Child Plan 
Key Features

> Offers ample flexibility of withdrawal as per requirement, one can also stop premium payments after the minimum period.

> Can use mix of debt - Equity within the same plan to build the corpus.

> Can choose both premium & sum assured as required - unlike traditional plan where you are required to pay a certain premium on the sum assured chosen by you.
Key points to note:Whilst choosing Insurance
> The cover should be on the parent - some offer life cover on child, avoid such plans.

> Assess whether plan has WoP (Waiver of Premium) benefit - on the eventuality of the proposer the future premiums are waived off and the policy will continue to offer payouts as pre-determined.

> Traditional plans are best suitable for child`s age between 0-5 year, post this the no. of years available to build the corpus becomes less and hence, traditional insurance may tend to become ineffective. In that case, ULIPs can be a better option.

> Children insurances are tax deductible up to Rs 1 lakh, under section 80 C, hence, you can end up taking care of your tax planning and children needs as well.
Whilst choosing Child benefit Mutual Funds
> An ideal time-frame to include mutual funds within your portfolio to build corpus is 3-5 years which is essentially short-medium term.

> Some of them have a lock-in till the child attains 18 years of age or at least a 3 year lock-in.

>Falls within the moderate risk profile, there is a considerable amount parked in debt
> No tax benefit can be availed.

Hope this note enables you to make the right choice for securing the future of your child and their dreams!

Real estate still an investment option

Real estate as an asset class comes with its own unique characteristics of risk and return. The return from real estate investing comes from capital appreciation as well as regular income from rentals.

Its risk profile is quite different from equities and bonds and, therefore, its performance has little correlation to the performance of equities and bonds. This makes real estate an ideal diversifier to a portfolio of conventional investments.

The inherent risk of equities and real estate is termed high but at particular price level this may be reduced and entries at such points can create long-term alpha which may be difficult to beat. That wonderful time to invest in property when prices were distressed is definitely gone. The investments in property now will not yield super normal return.

However, that does not take away the importance of real estate in a portfolio. Real estate provides both a regular cash flow of income to the owner in the form of rent as well as capital appreciation. The compounding effect of the two put together over the long term adds up to a very decent return. It is also a very acceptable form of collateral for loans and provides an inflation hedge in a manner quite similar to investing in non-perishable commodities such as gold.

Entry, exit points

Outperformance on portfolios can be achieved through proper entry and exit points. It is very difficult to time the exits right but it may be relatively easier to time the points of entry right. A good point of entry in any asset creates margin of safety and helps in capturing the upside.

These great points of entry present themselves at times of extreme pessimism for the asset class. The returns get magnified as the pessimism starts to abate and the asset reverts to normal levels of risk-return profile. Such a time to invest in real estate is behind us. Looking at the trends of the industry, the sector has come back to normal and the problems related to the sector have reduced in magnitude. The sector thrives on leverage whether it is at the consumer level or at the developer level.

A credit squeeze in either side results in the sector seeing tough times. The credit to the sector and demand for housing loans is definitely picking up which has led to a strong bounce-back.

A large number of developers have been able to successfully recapitalize the balance-sheets, thus improving their financial stability and outlook. The encouraging responses to their recent project launches have led to improved cash flows. This in turn has provided a boost to the developers to consider land acquisitions at attractive prices. As most of these projects are likely to be mixed-use/commercial projects, the positive response to the recent land auctions also signals towards likely recovery in the commercial vertical.

Strong volumes

Residential projects across segments have witnessed strong volumes. For instance: (i)
Phase-III of DLF``s residential project in Delhi, Capital Greens, received encouraging response, and (ii) Godrej Properties sold/booked 800 units at its mid-income housing project in Ahmedabad, Godrej Garden City, within one week of launch.

Backed by strong sales volumes, developers in Mumbai and the National Capital Region (NCR) have undertaken multiple price increases across projects over the last 3-6 months. On an average, prices have increased by approximately 30% across projects in these regions. These are times when investors have been worried about the sector.
Residential volumes continue to gain momentum in key cities such as Bangalore and Chennai in the South, led by improved IT/ITES outlook and stable rates in these locations.

The commercial vertical has been witnessing encouraging signs of revival. While transaction volumes over the last 3-4 months were aided by demand from non-IT (mainly telecom and pharmaceutical) companies, in the last 1-2 months, there has been a pick-up in volumes from IT/ITES companies. Historically, IT/ITES accounted for 80% of the commercial office demand. Vacancy levels are likely to drop to 20% in CY11 from the current 24% due to sharp supply curtailment. The real estate sector remains firmly set for recovery, following the successful balance-sheet recapitalization by key real estate companies and pick-up in deal activity.

The key catalysts that would drive the sector in the medium term are recovery in the commercial and retail verticals, and visible acceleration in execution of projects.

Return maximization with the Right Fund!

So, you have just decided to purchase a unit-linked insurance policy. You would have taken your time to do your need analysis, and then zeroed in on your insurance plan. But, have you spent time to decide on the fund in which the monies will be invested?

This decision is equally critical, as the returns and the safety will be linked to this decision. It is also recommended to keep reviewing the funds on a periodic basis.

The funds can be categorized into 4 types:

Aggressive Funds: The equity component will be greater than 80% of the corpus, and the rest will comprise of government securities and debt instruments. These funds will tend to give higher returns over a period, but the returns will be linked to the movement to the equity market, and can be varying.

Prudent Funds: The equity component will be greater than 40%, and lower than 80%, and rest will comprise of government securities and debt instruments. The returns will be more stable, but the yields will likely be lower than aggressive funds over a longer time period.

Conservative Funds: The equity component will be lesser than 40%, and government securities & debt instruments will form a sizable chunk of the investment corpus. The returns will be stable, and more predictable.

Special Funds: These will be guarantee funds or thematic funds, and these will be out of purview of our viewpoints.

The common fund names used in the industry are as follows:


Fund Type
Equity Component
Common Names of the Funds
Aggressive
> 80%
Large Cap, Equity, Aggressive, Growth, Maximizer, Opportunities, Frontline Equity, Enhancer
Prudent
> 40%, < 80%
Balanced, Creator, Secure, Vantage, Flexi,
Conservative
< 40%
Bond, Debt, Money Market, Protector, Defensive
Special
N.A
Highest NAV Guarantee, PSU, Dynamic
Most unit-linked insurance plans allow you to allocate your monies in multiple funds, and also to periodically switch your monies between your various funds. These features should be used very effectively to maximize your returns.

The investment decision is a function of the risk appetite of the policyholder, and the policyholder is also advised to remember the financial rule of ``High Risk, High Gain``, which means that investors looking for higher returns will invest in securities with higher volatility, and the investors looking for safety in investment will invest in securities will lower returns. A policyholder looking at higher returns will invest in aggressive funds, but the returns will be linked to the returns on the equity market. A policyholder looking for returns as well as safety will invest in prudent funds, where the returns will be lower but with greater safety than aggressive funds. A policyholder giving higher weightage to safety will invest in Conservative funds, wherein the safety is very high, but the returns will be low. The policyholder is advised to base his/ her investment decision on his/ her risk appetite, and also take advice from his/ her financial counselor. The parameters mentioned below can also act as guiding principles, and the policyholder is advised to use his/ her individual discretion before selecting the fund.

The key parameters advised for fund selection are:
> Insurance Plan Type

> Age of Entry

> Policy Tenure

> Market Conditions at Entry

> Policy Term Remaining


Let us understand each of these parameters in depth, and see how they impact the fund selection advisory.

Insurance Plan Type: The three types of insurance plans are Pension plans, Child plans & Investment plans. In pension plans, it is recommended to invest in prudent funds, if the policy tenure is more than 20 years, and in Conservative funds, if the policy tenure is less than 20 years. This fund selection is recommended as the policy holder will be building up a corpus for his/ her post retirement life, and it is recommended to avoid taking aggressive decisions regarding investment for this insurance plan. In child plans, as the policy tenure is limited to a maximum of 25 years, and the purpose is to build a corpus for the child`s future, it recommended to invest in Prudent Funds. In Investment plans, the policy holder should invest in Aggressive Funds and Prudent Funds, in a ratio which would be comfortable to the policyholder, and it should be accompanied by regular monitoring of market movement.

Age of Entry: The policyholder`s risk taking ability is a function of the age of the individual. A younger individual (age less than 35 years) would prefer to invest in aggressive funds, a middle-aged individual (age between 36 years and 45 years) would prefer to invest in prudent funds, and an older individual would prefer to invest in conservative funds.

Policy tenure: Unit-linked insurance plans are generally up to 25 years tenure, except the pension plans, which are longer. In longer policy tenures (tenures greater than 15 years), the policy holder can invest some monies in the aggressive funds, but for shorter policy tenures, the policy holder is advised to invest in prudent/ conservative funds.

Market conditions at Entry: The investment in an insurance plan is over a longer period, and hence the market conditions at the time of opting for the insurance plan become relatively less important factor. Policyholders are advised to avoid timing the market, as the investment returns tend to average out over the policy tenure. Hence, this should not be a factor in the fund selection. Also, most insurance plans allow deferment of maturity benefit, wherein the policyholder is allowed to keeps funds with the Insurer for up to 5 years after maturity, in case the policy holder feels the market conditions are not favorable at maturity.

Policy tenure remaining: This is an important parameter for return maximization, and the fund switching facility should be used for this purpose. Your investment gains over the policy tenure have to be protected, and this can be achieved by shifting your corpus to Prudent/ Conservative Funds in a phased manner in the last 5 years of the policy term. This feature is called as fund conservation, and is now being offered in certain unit-linked insurance plans.

On the basis of these five parameters, the policy-holder should evaluate his/ her investment objective and select the funds accordingly. There can be no single rule which can be used by the policy holders, these parameters mentioned above can act as guiding principles to zero in on fund selection, which will only help in maximizing the returns for the policy-holder.

Thursday, July 1, 2010

CRUDE OIL AND PICK THEORY

CRUDE OIL AND PICK THEORY

EXCLUSIVE CRUDE OIL REPORT

Yes, Crude Oil Prices can touch to New Highs and Beyond...

“ACCORDING TO ‘PICK OIL THEORY’ THE PRICES OF CRUDE OIL MAY TOUCH $300 PER BARREL”



BELL CURVE:
The production of crude oil normally follows  the shape of a ‘bell-curve’ in which we can say it to be peak production when on the graph this curve comes in the centre top. At this level the production has been peaked i.e. this is the time and quantum of maximum production and from here on the production decreases. (see figure). Paring some exceptions this phenomena is true for a single oil well, a whole oil-field, a country and the whole wordl.
“Peak-Oil doesn’t mean we will become ‘oil-less’, but is surely means we become ‘cheap oil-less”.

The pick oil theory which was made by American Geologist King Herbert, is also known as Herbert Pick Theory. According to this theory’s conclusions, due to declining exploration and sharply decreasing production ; we may see tremendous blast and rocket pace rise in prices of fossil fuels, mainly crude oil. This Pick Oil theory works on the basis of principle based on long-term production and declining reserve rate of fossil energy sources such as coal, crude oil, natural gas etc.
We will try to evaluate this theory through various facts, figures, logics and arguments in this special ‘$300 CRUDE OIL SPECIAL REPORT’.
-       There are many reasons behind the strengthening fears of decrease in the reserves/availability of traditional sources of energy such as fossil fuels (like crude oil etc.)  such as,
o   The technology relating to acquisition and analysis of geological information, is improving day by day.



o   The number of finds and exploration by way of drilling activity is decreasing day by day.
o   Question mark on the so-called and claimed ‘proven reserves’ of many countries and regions.
o   The present supply of word’s need is coming from such mega-oil fields which are very old and over-exploited and becoming less and less productive. Out of which most are located in Middle East countries and surrounding regions.
o   Many experts believe the global “pick oil’ production year will be the year of 2010 or anywhere between 2010-2020. But research suggests that we have already reached ‘pick oil’ production stage probably in year 2004. This phenomena can be understood in Figure no.1.
Figure No.1:

o   Moreover, the ‘proven reserves’ stated by ‘OPEC’ countries is also allegedly overstated by almost more than 300 barrels. The OPEC stand for the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.
About global ‘Proven Reserves’ of crude oil:
            According to a survey undertaken at the end of year 2007, it has been concluded that presently only 1000 billion barrels of producible reserves have been left on the earth.
            Moreover adding into this other 1000 billion barrel i.e. in total only 2000 billion barrel of crude oil reserve is out there in total for usage including explored, production able and still to be explored. Out of which 1000 billion barrel has already been produced. If we follow this calculation then the crude oil was at its maximum production level in the year 2006 and from now onwards we may start witnessing declining trend in everything ranging from exploration, production (and usage? Not really.). But if we deduct the allegedly so called overstated reserves of 300 billion barrels of the OPEC countries, then in that case few might have doubts that we already have passed the ‘pick crude oil production’ in the year 2004!
Other Reports raising concerns on the issue of declining reserves of crude oil, supply shortage and possibility of severe price rise:
Recently in a report published under title ‘Energy Trends and Their Implications for US Army Installations, by Pentagon also addresses this issues of ‘pick oil’. The report signals that the ‘pick’ has probably passed us or is very nearby and the global supply of crude is in shortage and will remain in such condition. Moreover the report also suggests that the previous run up in crude oil prices to as high as $150 per barrel was not purely due to speculation only but also due to demand-supply mismatch. It also signals more bad news from the demand supply front and indicated that the $150 price was merely a trailer and we may see the full picture in near future!
One another report published in March 2007 by the USA Government Accountability Office (GAO) titled ‘CRUDE OIL- Uncertainly about Future oil Supply makes It Important to Develop a Strategy for addressing a Peak and Decline in Oil Production”, also states similar concerns regarding crude oil production and its impacts. It states that the crude oil production may pick anywhere between now and 2040 and also warns that the US government is not at all aware and prepared to cope with this situation.
            “January 2006 issue of “Petroleum Intelligence” weekly depicts that according to internal secret documents of Kuwait, the proven oil reserves of the country are only around 25 billion barrels which is wrongly being claimed to be 100 billion barrel. Moreover out of this 25 billion barrel 15 billion are from its Bergan oil-field.”






OTHER NON-TRADITIONAL SOURCES OF OIL. HOW MUCH SUFFICIENT?
Crude oil’s other forms i.e. traditional sources of crude oil includes (1) tar sand oil (2) extra heavy oil (3) bitumen and oil shell as well. The total reserve of the above mentioned sources of oil has been estimated at 6.5 billion barrel. Out of which only 745 billion barrel is classified as acquirable out of the said reserves, 315 billion barrel of tar oil reserves in Canada, 270 billion barrel of extra-heavy oil and bitumen oil mass in Venezuela, and other globally dispersed 160 billion barrel of oil shell type mass is estimated to be in reach. 
But the question is how much is oil is produced out of these types of reserves? The National Energy Board or Canada puts a figure of 1 million per day of production of tar sand oil. The petroleum producers’ association of the country claims this figure to come to 3 million per day in/by year 2015. Now the problem is that to extract tar and sand to produce oil we have to use natural gas; and bad news is that the availability of natural gas is declining in Canada. This means that there will be less and less natural gas in days to come in Canada which can be deployed to extract oil out of tar and sand oil sources. There will be shortage of natural gas and we have to consider the prices of natural gas at respective times and the priority of usage, cost of opportunity for the commodity as well. According to estimated calculations if the production of tar and sand oil is aimed to increase by 2 million per day as mentioned above, then there will be 2.5 billion cubic feet of extra pressure and stress on the usage of natural gas or 15 per cent of the present 16.8 billion of usage.
It is estimated that by the year 2010 the contribution of the such types of non-traditional sources of fuel shall be only 2.80 million barrels per day, which is further expected to remain million per day by the year 2030. The research also suggests that by the year 2010 and 2030 respectively 3 per cent and 5 per cent of the pressure of fulfilling world’s oil requirement shall be on the said types of oil non-traditional oil resources.
During the year 2007 the said types of sources of oil contributed only around 1 per cent for the satisfaction of world’s primary energy and fuel needs, which is expected to go up to 6 percent in year 2025 and 13 per cent at the maximum in 2050.
See Figure No.C2 for more figures and estimates.
Figure No. C2. The contribution of non-traditional types of crude oil in global demand and usage of crude oil: 2007-2030:

2007
2010
2020
2030
Global Demand
85.76
93.30
111
117.4
Global Supply
81.53
83.6
81.58
82.90
Synthetic Fuel
1.72
2.80
4.20
6.00
Bio Fuel
0.53
0.60
0.70
1.00
Tar and Sand oil
1.00
1.60
2.50
3.56
Extra heavy type of oil
0.19
0.60
1.00
1.50
Global Demand in %
2
3
4
5
All figures are million barrels per day unless stated otherwise.
Sources: European Bio-diesel Board, answers.com, …….


 Table No. P1. Estimated and Actual production of oil. (2005-2030)
X
2005
2007
2010
2020
2030
Global Demand
84.50
85.76
93.30
111
117.40
Global Supply
81.70
81.53
82.60
81.58
82.90
Traditional
81.10
79.81
79.80
77.38
76.90
Non-traditional
1.6
1.72
2.80
4.20
6.00
Supply Shortage
(2.80)
(4.23)
(10.70)
(29.42)
(34.50)

Non-traditional=such as tar and sand oil, extra heavy oil, bitumen and shell oil etc.
All figures are in million barrel per day unless otherwise stated.
Sources: US Department of Energy’s ‘Energy Outlook-2007’, IAEA’s ‘World Energy Outlook-2007’, BP Statistical review of world energy-June 2008, and other sources.

Usage of primary energy. Year 2007-2050.
X
2007
2025
2050
Primary Energy
11,099
16,194
19,679
Oil
3,953
5,135
5,288
Natural Gas
2,638
5119
6927
Coal
3,178
3526
2748
Atomic  Energy
622
1061
1937
Hydro Energy
636
314
299
Alternative (renewable)
72
1039
2480
Percentage in total
1
6
13

All figures are in million ton unless otherwise stated.
 Sources: Shell International Scenarios in 2050, …………

WHAT COULD BE THE EFFECTS OF PICK OIL ON NORMAL POPULATION?
In the pace for becoming more and more advanced and modern; man has made oil become an integral and inseparable part of his life.  Presently on lands, in water, and in air; 90% of transportation is fueled by using oil as energy. Moreover according to research and survey, 90 per cent of material or goods available for sale and consumption in shops and malls of the world require oil as important ingredient for its use and consumption.

GEO POLITICS OF CRUDE OIL AND ‘PICK’ PHENOMENA:
USA is the number one consumer of crude oil.
In year 2007, USA consumed about 20.70 million barrels per day. Out of which only 6.87 million barrels was produced in USA and the rest 13.83 million barrel was imported from outside of the country.
The foreign dependence of USA for oil increased from 34% in 1973 to 67% in 2007. Moreover this dependence is expected to increase upto 72% in 2010 and 84% in 2025. This could literally mean that the interference of USA  in oil rich countries will continue and infact rise. Also the autocracy structure in some oil producing countries, violence and violent protests against US as well as the competition for declining supplies is making things look even grimmer.
The US strategy for oil would, over and above the five gulf oil producing countries, include another main eight sources of crude oil namely;  Russia, Maxico, Azerbaijan, Colombia, Venezuala, Kazakhistan, Nigeria, Angola. But the oil production and supply in these countries is entangled with rampant violence, terrorism, corruption, mafia, political upheavals, and weird dictatorships or communism. Thus the US is forced in deep relation with such states.
The point is that political upheavels, corruption and violence in these countries could trap US troops and may cause a situation of putting military forces of the world one on one. Because all the countries (most importantly powerful ones), want to secure their oil supplies and would badly want.
Moreover, we could we could see China taking closer and serious interest in middle-east politics. As well as try and strike various deals and contracts with these and the other eight problematic oil producing countries. This could also involve supplying arms, weapons, technology and other dangerous materials such as ballestic missiles, nuclear technology etc. and all these would help the agitators and anti-US groups to take their fight further and strengthen their position against the US.
On the other hand if we look into the past, the policies of US have remained quite clear. Sine second world war, most US presidents have for one or the other reason, taken military activities in middle-east regions. To the extent that in 1980 the then president Jimmy Carter officially declared that the US must hold strong in the Persian Gulf region at any cost. And the same seems to have been followed till date, although many billions of dollars have been wasted in this practice.
Iran: in last two years, the political action in crude and gas geo-politics has heated up. It is not proved how much oil reserves it has; although is continuously reiterates the threat  that if US and internation agencies continue to unfairly try to pressurize Iran for putting control and surveillance on its nuclear enrichment activities; it would divert the flow of its oil and gas supply to only and only China and stop supplying to US and its allies. Venezuala is also teasing US for similar and variety reasons. Russia has also threatened Ukrain to raise gas prices for its supplies or else it will stop production. This could have direct impact on Europes’ supplies, because Russia supplies the majority of Europe’s gas consumption.  Earlier, Russia stopped supplies to Belarus.
Another worry some matter in geo-politics has been the practice of nationalizing oil and gas corporation in latin American companies.
The US understands that in the way india’s economy is growing and demand and consumption of oil and gas is rising. It also understands that the Iran-Pakistan-India pipeline project could strengthen the relations of Iran and India. For this reason it is doing all the possible efforts to block this deal and put a standstill and consequently a full stop on the tri-nation developments and it seems to have succeeded in so much extent.




The Soudi Arabia has claimed a reserve of around 265 billion barrel within its territories. However the international oil experts have clearly negated this figure and puts it at only 100 to 120 billion barrel, almost half of what Soudi is claiming to have remained in reserves.




HOW MUCH PRODUCTION LEFT AND HOW MUCH EMPTY IN DIFFERENT OIL PRODUCING REGIONS:
Please refer to table A1.
Table A1.
Crude oil-exploration, production, reserve depletion and pick:                       
COUNTRY
YR OF (PICK) FINDS
YR OF (PICK) PRODUCTION
% OF EXPLORED OUT OF TOTAL
% OF CONSUMED/
DEPLETED
FINAL REMAINING PRODUCTION (BN BARREL)
CHINA
60s
2006
93
47
57
CANADA
50s
1973
95
76
25
IRAN
60s
1974
94
76
130
IRAQ
70s
2019
87
20
135
INDONESIA
50s
1977
93
65
31
KUWAIT
50s
1971
93
34
90
LIBYA
60s
1970
94
42
55
MEXICO
50s
2002
94
55
55
NORWAY
70s
2001
93
48
33
RUSSIA
40s
1987
94
61
200
SOUDI ARAB
40s
2013
96
31
300
UAE
60s
2014
94
23
78
UK
70s
1944
94
63
32
USA
30s
1972
98
88
195
VENEZUALA
50s
1970
96
48
95
WORLD
62
05-10
94
49
2100
Sources: ASPO, Peakoil.net, theenerrgyfiles ltd., chevron, petroleum review and others.

Moreover, three of the world’s major oil-fields have already picked. These includes Kuwait’s Burgan which is the world’s second largest oil-field and supplies 60% of Kuwait’s crude oil production. This oil-field is said to have picked in the year 2005.
The big Cantarell oil-field of Mexico is also picked in the year of 2006. From which in place of earlier daily 1.99 million barrel; last year only 1 million barrel production was witnessed.
Soudi Arab’s world’s largets oil-field Ghavar; which likewise Kuwait’s Burgan oil-field contributes about 60% of the oil production of the Gulf State. This oil-field produces daily 5 million barrel and it is said to have been picked in the year 2006, as well as registering a decline of 8% per year.
Soudi’s four big oil-fields namely Ghavar, Hanifa, Afji, and Safania; are more than 50 years older now. And the majority of Soudi’s oil during the last 5 years has been produced out of these fields.
The more worrisome thing is that recently a huge water treatment has been supplied to this oil-well by infusing water into it-and this treatment is very serious. Because these oil-fields shows full possibility of 30-40 per cent decline in normal production which could be in next three-four years or may be three-four months! Who knows!
Table-A0.
Use of primary energy globally (consumption in %) yr 2007.
CRUDE OIL
NAT GAS
COAL
NUCLEAR ENERGY
HYDRO-ELECTRICITY
TOTAL
36%
24%
29%
5%
6%
100%

  “January 2006 issue of “Petroleum Intelligence” weekly depicts that according to internal secret documents of Kuwait, the proven oil reserves of the country are only around 25 billion barrels which is wrongly being claimed to be 100 billion barrel. Moreover out of this 25 billion barrel 15 billion are from its Bergan oil-field.” 

 Table-A2.
World oil reserves, depletion rate, remaining reserves etc. (year 2007).
x
Billion Barrel
Particulars
Total Reserves
2100
Figure of total produced when production will completely stop.
Till date produced
1087
Uptill the end of 2007
Still remain to be produced
1013
Total reserves-produced (2100-1087=1013)
Till date explored
1994
Total produced+remaining
Till date still remains to be explored
106
Total reserves-explored (2100-1994)
Rate of exploration (million per year)
6
Addition in new oil reserves
Depletion/consumption rate
3
Annual production rate out of the remaining to be produced.



Caption:
Due to London’s status as a financial center, and its increasing dependence on financial services revenue. The production of crude oil from UK has been over and it was exporting crude oil for 26 years and now due to this phenomenal change its currency pound’s value (exchange rate) will decrease.
Caption:
“the basic funda of peak theory has been that from beginning the type of crude oil’s exploration and production method has been; on that basis the explorable and producible crude oil of that as well as the maximum producible-time; i.e both of these has been on peak in terms of plain figures. Which shows that the peak has passed us.”
Caption:
The production of crude oil normally follows a bell-curve. Where we can predict peak production when on this graph the curve is exactly in the centre of in the middle top. At this point it can be said that the half of the oil has been produced. (see figure.)

GEO POLITICS OF CRUDE OIL AND ‘PICK’ PHENOMENA:
USA is the number one consumer of crude oil. In year 2007, USA consumed about 20.70 million barrels per day. Out of which only 6.87 million barrels was produced in USA and the rest 13.83 million barrel was imported from outside of the country.
The foreign dependence of USA for oil increased from 34% in 1973 to 67% in 2007. Moreover this dependence is expected to increase up to 72% in 2010 and 84% in 2025. This could literally mean that the interference of USA in oil rich countries will continue and in fact rise. Also the autocracy structure in some oil producing countries, violence and violent protests against US as well as the competition for declining supplies is making things look even grimmer.
The US strategy for oil would, over and above the five gulf oil producing countries, include another main eight sources of crude oil namely;  Russia, Mexico, Azerbaijan, Colombia, Venezuela, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, Angola. But the oil production and supply in these countries is entangled with rampant violence, terrorism, corruption, mafia, political upheavals, and weird dictatorships or communism. Thus the US is forced in deep relation with such states.
The point is that political upheavals, corruption and violence in these countries could trap US troops and may cause a situation of putting military forces of the world one on one. Because all the countries (most importantly powerful ones), want to secure their oil supplies and would badly want.
Moreover, we could we could see China taking closer and serious interest in middle-east politics. As well as try and strike various deals and contracts with these and the other eight problematic oil producing countries. This could also involve supplying arms, weapons, technology and other dangerous materials such as ballistic missiles, nuclear technology etc. and all these would help the agitators and anti-US groups to take their fight further and strengthen their position against the US.
On the other hand if we look into the past, the policies of US have remained quite clear. Sine Second World War, most US presidents have for one or the other reason, taken military activities in middle-east regions. To the extent that in 1980 the then president Jimmy Carter officially declared that the US must hold strong in the Persian Gulf region at any cost. And the same seems to have been followed till date, although many billions of dollars have been wasted in this practice.
Iran: in last two years, the political action in crude and gas geo-politics has heated up. It is not proved how much oil reserves it has; although is continuously reiterates the threat  that if US and international agencies continue to unfairly try to pressurize Iran for putting control and surveillance on its nuclear enrichment activities; it would divert the flow of its oil and gas supply to only and only China and stop supplying to US and its allies. Venezuela is also teasing US for similar and variety reasons. Russia has also threatened Ukraine to raise gas prices for its supplies or else it will stop production. This could have direct impact on Europe’s’ supplies, because Russia supplies the majority of Europe’s gas consumption.  Earlier, Russia stopped supplies to Belarus.
Another worry some matter in geo-politics has been the practice of nationalizing oil and Gas Corporation in Latin American companies.
The US understands that in the way India’s economy is growing and demand and consumption of oil and gas is rising. It also understands that the Iran-Pakistan-India pipeline project could strengthen the relations of Iran and India. For this reason it is doing all the possible efforts to block this deal and put a standstill and consequently a full stop on the tri-nation developments and it seems to have succeeded in so much extent.



THE OPTIMISTS' VIEW
The optimists believe that still in the world there is 2 trillion barrel of crude oil reserves to be eand produced. Whereas other rationalists group believe that this figure to be even less than 1 trillion barrels. But in case if we go by the figure of optimists of 2 trillion barrels; the peak in crude oil could well be as far as in the year 2025. 

WHAT COULD BE THE EFFECTS OF PICK OIL ON NORMAL POPULATION?
In the pace for becoming more and more advanced and modern; man has made oil become an integral and inseparable part of his life.  Presently on lands, in water, and in air; 90% of transportation is fueled by using oil as energy. Moreover according to research and survey, 90 per cent of material or goods available for sale and consumption in shops and malls of the world require oil as important ingredient for its use and consumption.
Together with this we can give several other figures, surveys, facts and studies to show the high dependence of mankind on oil. Even more worrisome fact is that in spite of all the advanced technological development, we have not found any strong alternate source of energy.
EROI ratio (Energy Return on Investment ratio and crude oil):
For doing valuation of source of energy, this “net energy” or “EROI-energy return on investment” ratio becomes helpful. The countries of world have been growing at a rapid pace and one of the important reasons for this is high EROI ratio for the crude oil. In the beginning days of crude oil this ratio was 50:1 i.e. to produce 50 barrels of crude oil it take 1 barrel of crude oil as input. But recently this ratio has come down to 5:7, and at many production places it also equals to ratio of 1:1. Interestingly and apparently the EROI ratio of Ethanol and biodiesel has been even below 1. While the EROI ratio for wind-power is better than that. But the problem is that the kind of demand  that has been built into the routine of the industrial and emerging nations; the supply and capacity of such alternative sources are incapable.