Thursday, July 1, 2010

CRUDE OIL AND PICK THEORY

CRUDE OIL AND PICK THEORY

EXCLUSIVE CRUDE OIL REPORT

Yes, Crude Oil Prices can touch to New Highs and Beyond...

“ACCORDING TO ‘PICK OIL THEORY’ THE PRICES OF CRUDE OIL MAY TOUCH $300 PER BARREL”



BELL CURVE:
The production of crude oil normally follows  the shape of a ‘bell-curve’ in which we can say it to be peak production when on the graph this curve comes in the centre top. At this level the production has been peaked i.e. this is the time and quantum of maximum production and from here on the production decreases. (see figure). Paring some exceptions this phenomena is true for a single oil well, a whole oil-field, a country and the whole wordl.
“Peak-Oil doesn’t mean we will become ‘oil-less’, but is surely means we become ‘cheap oil-less”.

The pick oil theory which was made by American Geologist King Herbert, is also known as Herbert Pick Theory. According to this theory’s conclusions, due to declining exploration and sharply decreasing production ; we may see tremendous blast and rocket pace rise in prices of fossil fuels, mainly crude oil. This Pick Oil theory works on the basis of principle based on long-term production and declining reserve rate of fossil energy sources such as coal, crude oil, natural gas etc.
We will try to evaluate this theory through various facts, figures, logics and arguments in this special ‘$300 CRUDE OIL SPECIAL REPORT’.
-       There are many reasons behind the strengthening fears of decrease in the reserves/availability of traditional sources of energy such as fossil fuels (like crude oil etc.)  such as,
o   The technology relating to acquisition and analysis of geological information, is improving day by day.



o   The number of finds and exploration by way of drilling activity is decreasing day by day.
o   Question mark on the so-called and claimed ‘proven reserves’ of many countries and regions.
o   The present supply of word’s need is coming from such mega-oil fields which are very old and over-exploited and becoming less and less productive. Out of which most are located in Middle East countries and surrounding regions.
o   Many experts believe the global “pick oil’ production year will be the year of 2010 or anywhere between 2010-2020. But research suggests that we have already reached ‘pick oil’ production stage probably in year 2004. This phenomena can be understood in Figure no.1.
Figure No.1:

o   Moreover, the ‘proven reserves’ stated by ‘OPEC’ countries is also allegedly overstated by almost more than 300 barrels. The OPEC stand for the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.
About global ‘Proven Reserves’ of crude oil:
            According to a survey undertaken at the end of year 2007, it has been concluded that presently only 1000 billion barrels of producible reserves have been left on the earth.
            Moreover adding into this other 1000 billion barrel i.e. in total only 2000 billion barrel of crude oil reserve is out there in total for usage including explored, production able and still to be explored. Out of which 1000 billion barrel has already been produced. If we follow this calculation then the crude oil was at its maximum production level in the year 2006 and from now onwards we may start witnessing declining trend in everything ranging from exploration, production (and usage? Not really.). But if we deduct the allegedly so called overstated reserves of 300 billion barrels of the OPEC countries, then in that case few might have doubts that we already have passed the ‘pick crude oil production’ in the year 2004!
Other Reports raising concerns on the issue of declining reserves of crude oil, supply shortage and possibility of severe price rise:
Recently in a report published under title ‘Energy Trends and Their Implications for US Army Installations, by Pentagon also addresses this issues of ‘pick oil’. The report signals that the ‘pick’ has probably passed us or is very nearby and the global supply of crude is in shortage and will remain in such condition. Moreover the report also suggests that the previous run up in crude oil prices to as high as $150 per barrel was not purely due to speculation only but also due to demand-supply mismatch. It also signals more bad news from the demand supply front and indicated that the $150 price was merely a trailer and we may see the full picture in near future!
One another report published in March 2007 by the USA Government Accountability Office (GAO) titled ‘CRUDE OIL- Uncertainly about Future oil Supply makes It Important to Develop a Strategy for addressing a Peak and Decline in Oil Production”, also states similar concerns regarding crude oil production and its impacts. It states that the crude oil production may pick anywhere between now and 2040 and also warns that the US government is not at all aware and prepared to cope with this situation.
            “January 2006 issue of “Petroleum Intelligence” weekly depicts that according to internal secret documents of Kuwait, the proven oil reserves of the country are only around 25 billion barrels which is wrongly being claimed to be 100 billion barrel. Moreover out of this 25 billion barrel 15 billion are from its Bergan oil-field.”






OTHER NON-TRADITIONAL SOURCES OF OIL. HOW MUCH SUFFICIENT?
Crude oil’s other forms i.e. traditional sources of crude oil includes (1) tar sand oil (2) extra heavy oil (3) bitumen and oil shell as well. The total reserve of the above mentioned sources of oil has been estimated at 6.5 billion barrel. Out of which only 745 billion barrel is classified as acquirable out of the said reserves, 315 billion barrel of tar oil reserves in Canada, 270 billion barrel of extra-heavy oil and bitumen oil mass in Venezuela, and other globally dispersed 160 billion barrel of oil shell type mass is estimated to be in reach. 
But the question is how much is oil is produced out of these types of reserves? The National Energy Board or Canada puts a figure of 1 million per day of production of tar sand oil. The petroleum producers’ association of the country claims this figure to come to 3 million per day in/by year 2015. Now the problem is that to extract tar and sand to produce oil we have to use natural gas; and bad news is that the availability of natural gas is declining in Canada. This means that there will be less and less natural gas in days to come in Canada which can be deployed to extract oil out of tar and sand oil sources. There will be shortage of natural gas and we have to consider the prices of natural gas at respective times and the priority of usage, cost of opportunity for the commodity as well. According to estimated calculations if the production of tar and sand oil is aimed to increase by 2 million per day as mentioned above, then there will be 2.5 billion cubic feet of extra pressure and stress on the usage of natural gas or 15 per cent of the present 16.8 billion of usage.
It is estimated that by the year 2010 the contribution of the such types of non-traditional sources of fuel shall be only 2.80 million barrels per day, which is further expected to remain million per day by the year 2030. The research also suggests that by the year 2010 and 2030 respectively 3 per cent and 5 per cent of the pressure of fulfilling world’s oil requirement shall be on the said types of oil non-traditional oil resources.
During the year 2007 the said types of sources of oil contributed only around 1 per cent for the satisfaction of world’s primary energy and fuel needs, which is expected to go up to 6 percent in year 2025 and 13 per cent at the maximum in 2050.
See Figure No.C2 for more figures and estimates.
Figure No. C2. The contribution of non-traditional types of crude oil in global demand and usage of crude oil: 2007-2030:

2007
2010
2020
2030
Global Demand
85.76
93.30
111
117.4
Global Supply
81.53
83.6
81.58
82.90
Synthetic Fuel
1.72
2.80
4.20
6.00
Bio Fuel
0.53
0.60
0.70
1.00
Tar and Sand oil
1.00
1.60
2.50
3.56
Extra heavy type of oil
0.19
0.60
1.00
1.50
Global Demand in %
2
3
4
5
All figures are million barrels per day unless stated otherwise.
Sources: European Bio-diesel Board, answers.com, …….


 Table No. P1. Estimated and Actual production of oil. (2005-2030)
X
2005
2007
2010
2020
2030
Global Demand
84.50
85.76
93.30
111
117.40
Global Supply
81.70
81.53
82.60
81.58
82.90
Traditional
81.10
79.81
79.80
77.38
76.90
Non-traditional
1.6
1.72
2.80
4.20
6.00
Supply Shortage
(2.80)
(4.23)
(10.70)
(29.42)
(34.50)

Non-traditional=such as tar and sand oil, extra heavy oil, bitumen and shell oil etc.
All figures are in million barrel per day unless otherwise stated.
Sources: US Department of Energy’s ‘Energy Outlook-2007’, IAEA’s ‘World Energy Outlook-2007’, BP Statistical review of world energy-June 2008, and other sources.

Usage of primary energy. Year 2007-2050.
X
2007
2025
2050
Primary Energy
11,099
16,194
19,679
Oil
3,953
5,135
5,288
Natural Gas
2,638
5119
6927
Coal
3,178
3526
2748
Atomic  Energy
622
1061
1937
Hydro Energy
636
314
299
Alternative (renewable)
72
1039
2480
Percentage in total
1
6
13

All figures are in million ton unless otherwise stated.
 Sources: Shell International Scenarios in 2050, …………

WHAT COULD BE THE EFFECTS OF PICK OIL ON NORMAL POPULATION?
In the pace for becoming more and more advanced and modern; man has made oil become an integral and inseparable part of his life.  Presently on lands, in water, and in air; 90% of transportation is fueled by using oil as energy. Moreover according to research and survey, 90 per cent of material or goods available for sale and consumption in shops and malls of the world require oil as important ingredient for its use and consumption.

GEO POLITICS OF CRUDE OIL AND ‘PICK’ PHENOMENA:
USA is the number one consumer of crude oil.
In year 2007, USA consumed about 20.70 million barrels per day. Out of which only 6.87 million barrels was produced in USA and the rest 13.83 million barrel was imported from outside of the country.
The foreign dependence of USA for oil increased from 34% in 1973 to 67% in 2007. Moreover this dependence is expected to increase upto 72% in 2010 and 84% in 2025. This could literally mean that the interference of USA  in oil rich countries will continue and infact rise. Also the autocracy structure in some oil producing countries, violence and violent protests against US as well as the competition for declining supplies is making things look even grimmer.
The US strategy for oil would, over and above the five gulf oil producing countries, include another main eight sources of crude oil namely;  Russia, Maxico, Azerbaijan, Colombia, Venezuala, Kazakhistan, Nigeria, Angola. But the oil production and supply in these countries is entangled with rampant violence, terrorism, corruption, mafia, political upheavals, and weird dictatorships or communism. Thus the US is forced in deep relation with such states.
The point is that political upheavels, corruption and violence in these countries could trap US troops and may cause a situation of putting military forces of the world one on one. Because all the countries (most importantly powerful ones), want to secure their oil supplies and would badly want.
Moreover, we could we could see China taking closer and serious interest in middle-east politics. As well as try and strike various deals and contracts with these and the other eight problematic oil producing countries. This could also involve supplying arms, weapons, technology and other dangerous materials such as ballestic missiles, nuclear technology etc. and all these would help the agitators and anti-US groups to take their fight further and strengthen their position against the US.
On the other hand if we look into the past, the policies of US have remained quite clear. Sine second world war, most US presidents have for one or the other reason, taken military activities in middle-east regions. To the extent that in 1980 the then president Jimmy Carter officially declared that the US must hold strong in the Persian Gulf region at any cost. And the same seems to have been followed till date, although many billions of dollars have been wasted in this practice.
Iran: in last two years, the political action in crude and gas geo-politics has heated up. It is not proved how much oil reserves it has; although is continuously reiterates the threat  that if US and internation agencies continue to unfairly try to pressurize Iran for putting control and surveillance on its nuclear enrichment activities; it would divert the flow of its oil and gas supply to only and only China and stop supplying to US and its allies. Venezuala is also teasing US for similar and variety reasons. Russia has also threatened Ukrain to raise gas prices for its supplies or else it will stop production. This could have direct impact on Europes’ supplies, because Russia supplies the majority of Europe’s gas consumption.  Earlier, Russia stopped supplies to Belarus.
Another worry some matter in geo-politics has been the practice of nationalizing oil and gas corporation in latin American companies.
The US understands that in the way india’s economy is growing and demand and consumption of oil and gas is rising. It also understands that the Iran-Pakistan-India pipeline project could strengthen the relations of Iran and India. For this reason it is doing all the possible efforts to block this deal and put a standstill and consequently a full stop on the tri-nation developments and it seems to have succeeded in so much extent.




The Soudi Arabia has claimed a reserve of around 265 billion barrel within its territories. However the international oil experts have clearly negated this figure and puts it at only 100 to 120 billion barrel, almost half of what Soudi is claiming to have remained in reserves.




HOW MUCH PRODUCTION LEFT AND HOW MUCH EMPTY IN DIFFERENT OIL PRODUCING REGIONS:
Please refer to table A1.
Table A1.
Crude oil-exploration, production, reserve depletion and pick:                       
COUNTRY
YR OF (PICK) FINDS
YR OF (PICK) PRODUCTION
% OF EXPLORED OUT OF TOTAL
% OF CONSUMED/
DEPLETED
FINAL REMAINING PRODUCTION (BN BARREL)
CHINA
60s
2006
93
47
57
CANADA
50s
1973
95
76
25
IRAN
60s
1974
94
76
130
IRAQ
70s
2019
87
20
135
INDONESIA
50s
1977
93
65
31
KUWAIT
50s
1971
93
34
90
LIBYA
60s
1970
94
42
55
MEXICO
50s
2002
94
55
55
NORWAY
70s
2001
93
48
33
RUSSIA
40s
1987
94
61
200
SOUDI ARAB
40s
2013
96
31
300
UAE
60s
2014
94
23
78
UK
70s
1944
94
63
32
USA
30s
1972
98
88
195
VENEZUALA
50s
1970
96
48
95
WORLD
62
05-10
94
49
2100
Sources: ASPO, Peakoil.net, theenerrgyfiles ltd., chevron, petroleum review and others.

Moreover, three of the world’s major oil-fields have already picked. These includes Kuwait’s Burgan which is the world’s second largest oil-field and supplies 60% of Kuwait’s crude oil production. This oil-field is said to have picked in the year 2005.
The big Cantarell oil-field of Mexico is also picked in the year of 2006. From which in place of earlier daily 1.99 million barrel; last year only 1 million barrel production was witnessed.
Soudi Arab’s world’s largets oil-field Ghavar; which likewise Kuwait’s Burgan oil-field contributes about 60% of the oil production of the Gulf State. This oil-field produces daily 5 million barrel and it is said to have been picked in the year 2006, as well as registering a decline of 8% per year.
Soudi’s four big oil-fields namely Ghavar, Hanifa, Afji, and Safania; are more than 50 years older now. And the majority of Soudi’s oil during the last 5 years has been produced out of these fields.
The more worrisome thing is that recently a huge water treatment has been supplied to this oil-well by infusing water into it-and this treatment is very serious. Because these oil-fields shows full possibility of 30-40 per cent decline in normal production which could be in next three-four years or may be three-four months! Who knows!
Table-A0.
Use of primary energy globally (consumption in %) yr 2007.
CRUDE OIL
NAT GAS
COAL
NUCLEAR ENERGY
HYDRO-ELECTRICITY
TOTAL
36%
24%
29%
5%
6%
100%

  “January 2006 issue of “Petroleum Intelligence” weekly depicts that according to internal secret documents of Kuwait, the proven oil reserves of the country are only around 25 billion barrels which is wrongly being claimed to be 100 billion barrel. Moreover out of this 25 billion barrel 15 billion are from its Bergan oil-field.” 

 Table-A2.
World oil reserves, depletion rate, remaining reserves etc. (year 2007).
x
Billion Barrel
Particulars
Total Reserves
2100
Figure of total produced when production will completely stop.
Till date produced
1087
Uptill the end of 2007
Still remain to be produced
1013
Total reserves-produced (2100-1087=1013)
Till date explored
1994
Total produced+remaining
Till date still remains to be explored
106
Total reserves-explored (2100-1994)
Rate of exploration (million per year)
6
Addition in new oil reserves
Depletion/consumption rate
3
Annual production rate out of the remaining to be produced.



Caption:
Due to London’s status as a financial center, and its increasing dependence on financial services revenue. The production of crude oil from UK has been over and it was exporting crude oil for 26 years and now due to this phenomenal change its currency pound’s value (exchange rate) will decrease.
Caption:
“the basic funda of peak theory has been that from beginning the type of crude oil’s exploration and production method has been; on that basis the explorable and producible crude oil of that as well as the maximum producible-time; i.e both of these has been on peak in terms of plain figures. Which shows that the peak has passed us.”
Caption:
The production of crude oil normally follows a bell-curve. Where we can predict peak production when on this graph the curve is exactly in the centre of in the middle top. At this point it can be said that the half of the oil has been produced. (see figure.)

GEO POLITICS OF CRUDE OIL AND ‘PICK’ PHENOMENA:
USA is the number one consumer of crude oil. In year 2007, USA consumed about 20.70 million barrels per day. Out of which only 6.87 million barrels was produced in USA and the rest 13.83 million barrel was imported from outside of the country.
The foreign dependence of USA for oil increased from 34% in 1973 to 67% in 2007. Moreover this dependence is expected to increase up to 72% in 2010 and 84% in 2025. This could literally mean that the interference of USA in oil rich countries will continue and in fact rise. Also the autocracy structure in some oil producing countries, violence and violent protests against US as well as the competition for declining supplies is making things look even grimmer.
The US strategy for oil would, over and above the five gulf oil producing countries, include another main eight sources of crude oil namely;  Russia, Mexico, Azerbaijan, Colombia, Venezuela, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, Angola. But the oil production and supply in these countries is entangled with rampant violence, terrorism, corruption, mafia, political upheavals, and weird dictatorships or communism. Thus the US is forced in deep relation with such states.
The point is that political upheavals, corruption and violence in these countries could trap US troops and may cause a situation of putting military forces of the world one on one. Because all the countries (most importantly powerful ones), want to secure their oil supplies and would badly want.
Moreover, we could we could see China taking closer and serious interest in middle-east politics. As well as try and strike various deals and contracts with these and the other eight problematic oil producing countries. This could also involve supplying arms, weapons, technology and other dangerous materials such as ballistic missiles, nuclear technology etc. and all these would help the agitators and anti-US groups to take their fight further and strengthen their position against the US.
On the other hand if we look into the past, the policies of US have remained quite clear. Sine Second World War, most US presidents have for one or the other reason, taken military activities in middle-east regions. To the extent that in 1980 the then president Jimmy Carter officially declared that the US must hold strong in the Persian Gulf region at any cost. And the same seems to have been followed till date, although many billions of dollars have been wasted in this practice.
Iran: in last two years, the political action in crude and gas geo-politics has heated up. It is not proved how much oil reserves it has; although is continuously reiterates the threat  that if US and international agencies continue to unfairly try to pressurize Iran for putting control and surveillance on its nuclear enrichment activities; it would divert the flow of its oil and gas supply to only and only China and stop supplying to US and its allies. Venezuela is also teasing US for similar and variety reasons. Russia has also threatened Ukraine to raise gas prices for its supplies or else it will stop production. This could have direct impact on Europe’s’ supplies, because Russia supplies the majority of Europe’s gas consumption.  Earlier, Russia stopped supplies to Belarus.
Another worry some matter in geo-politics has been the practice of nationalizing oil and Gas Corporation in Latin American companies.
The US understands that in the way India’s economy is growing and demand and consumption of oil and gas is rising. It also understands that the Iran-Pakistan-India pipeline project could strengthen the relations of Iran and India. For this reason it is doing all the possible efforts to block this deal and put a standstill and consequently a full stop on the tri-nation developments and it seems to have succeeded in so much extent.



THE OPTIMISTS' VIEW
The optimists believe that still in the world there is 2 trillion barrel of crude oil reserves to be eand produced. Whereas other rationalists group believe that this figure to be even less than 1 trillion barrels. But in case if we go by the figure of optimists of 2 trillion barrels; the peak in crude oil could well be as far as in the year 2025. 

WHAT COULD BE THE EFFECTS OF PICK OIL ON NORMAL POPULATION?
In the pace for becoming more and more advanced and modern; man has made oil become an integral and inseparable part of his life.  Presently on lands, in water, and in air; 90% of transportation is fueled by using oil as energy. Moreover according to research and survey, 90 per cent of material or goods available for sale and consumption in shops and malls of the world require oil as important ingredient for its use and consumption.
Together with this we can give several other figures, surveys, facts and studies to show the high dependence of mankind on oil. Even more worrisome fact is that in spite of all the advanced technological development, we have not found any strong alternate source of energy.
EROI ratio (Energy Return on Investment ratio and crude oil):
For doing valuation of source of energy, this “net energy” or “EROI-energy return on investment” ratio becomes helpful. The countries of world have been growing at a rapid pace and one of the important reasons for this is high EROI ratio for the crude oil. In the beginning days of crude oil this ratio was 50:1 i.e. to produce 50 barrels of crude oil it take 1 barrel of crude oil as input. But recently this ratio has come down to 5:7, and at many production places it also equals to ratio of 1:1. Interestingly and apparently the EROI ratio of Ethanol and biodiesel has been even below 1. While the EROI ratio for wind-power is better than that. But the problem is that the kind of demand  that has been built into the routine of the industrial and emerging nations; the supply and capacity of such alternative sources are incapable.

The Third Depression | 27.06.10 | Paul Krugman

By PAUL KRUGMAN
Recessions are common; depressions are rare. As far as I can tell, there were only two eras in economic history that were widely described as “depressions” at the time: the years of deflation and instability that followed the Panic of 1873 and the years of mass unemployment that followed the financial crisis of 1929-31.
Neither the Long Depression of the 19th century nor the Great Depression of the 20th was an era of nonstop decline — on the contrary, both included periods when the economy grew. But these episodes of improvement were never enough to undo the damage from the initial slump, and were followed by relapses.
We are now, I fear, in the early stages of a third depression. It will probably look more like the Long Depression than the much more severe Great Depression. But the cost — to the world economy and, above all, to the millions of lives blighted by the absence of jobs — will nonetheless be immense.
And this third depression will be primarily a failure of policy. Around the world — most recently at last weekend’s deeply discouraging G-20 meeting — governments are obsessing about inflation when the real threat is deflation, preaching the need for belt-tightening when the real problem is inadequate spending.
In 2008 and 2009, it seemed as if we might have learned from history. Unlike their predecessors, who raised interest rates in the face of financial crisis, the current leaders of the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank slashed rates and moved to support credit markets. Unlike governments of the past, which tried to balance budgets in the face of a plunging economy, today’s governments allowed deficits to rise. And better policies helped the world avoid complete collapse: the recession brought on by the financial crisis arguably ended last summer.
But future historians will tell us that this wasn’t the end of the third depression, just as the business upturn that began in 1933 wasn’t the end of the Great Depression. After all, unemployment — especially long-term unemployment — remains at levels that would have been considered catastrophic not long ago, and shows no sign of coming down rapidly. And both the United States and Europe are well on their way toward Japan-style deflationary traps.
In the face of this grim picture, you might have expected policy makers to realize that they haven’t yet done enough to promote recovery. But no: over the last few months there has been a stunning resurgence of hard-money and balanced-budget orthodoxy.
As far as rhetoric is concerned, the revival of the old-time religion is most evident in Europe, where officials seem to be getting their talking points from the collected speeches of Herbert Hoover, up to and including the claim that raising taxes and cutting spending will actually expand the economy, by improving business confidence. As a practical matter, however, America isn’t doing much better. The Fed seems aware of the deflationary risks — but what it proposes to do about these risks is, well, nothing. The Obama administration understands the dangers of premature fiscal austerity — but because Republicans and conservative Democrats in Congress won’t authorize additional aid to state governments, that austerity is coming anyway, in the form of budget cuts at the state and local levels.
Why the wrong turn in policy? The hard-liners often invoke the troubles facing Greece and other nations around the edges of Europe to justify their actions. And it’s true that bond investors have turned on governments with intractable deficits. But there is no evidence that short-run fiscal austerity in the face of a depressed economy reassures investors. On the contrary: Greece has agreed to harsh austerity, only to find its risk spreads growing ever wider; Ireland has imposed savage cuts in public spending, only to be treated by the markets as a worse risk than Spain, which has been far more reluctant to take the hard-liners’ medicine.
It’s almost as if the financial markets understand what policy makers seemingly don’t: that while long-term fiscal responsibility is important, slashing spending in the midst of a depression, which deepens that depression and paves the way for deflation, is actually self-defeating.
So I don’t think this is really about Greece, or indeed about any realistic appreciation of the tradeoffs between deficits and jobs. It is, instead, the victory of an orthodoxy that has little to do with rational analysis, whose main tenet is that imposing suffering on other people is how you show leadership in tough times.
And who will pay the price for this triumph of orthodoxy? The answer is, tens of millions of unemployed workers, many of whom will go jobless for years, and some of whom will never work again.

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Experience and Learning

Experiences and learning:

“The second name of experience is to learn”
-Dhirubhai Ambani

         Would anyone contradict with this great personality? Every day is experience, every hour is experience, every minute is experience, every event is experience, every response is experience, every action is experience, and every reaction is experience. So does that mean all the life is experience? And by virtue of all the experiences being learning; there is nothing in saying that life is an experience or/and learning. Experience can also be described as the meeting place or convergence of the situation one faces and the mental effects of those situations.
            There is a thin differentiation understanding it. But there are few things to it. All experience, but all do not learn. So for those of them experience is not learning. (here we take the discussion forward on premises that (1) human being should learn from experiences.(2) human being should be progressive (3) human being is assumed to improve from after each experience.) On the other hand, it doesn’t mean those who learn stop experiencing. No, but they will have new experiences. Will become successful, less obstacles, things become easier, less problems, they become smart and smarter. And then they get new type of experience. The learning from their experiences makes them shielding of doing more right things while having new experience and less wrong things/mistakes.
This works in markets also. Because you know how to calculate numbers and that you have mastered the philosophy of value investing or you have seen two generations of bull and bear cycles-doesn’t mean you are done. Please Pay attention Here-These are all ‘experiences’= yourself (the physical you) and your emotions/brains (mind) meeting the events. But if you have learned from ‘those experiences’ then you will do more of right things and less wrong things WHILE HAVING NEW EXPERIENCES. 

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Wait for prices to fall before investing in Gold ETFs: Experts

Gold Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), where money is parked in bullion, have seen their assets rising over 15% in last two months, but analysts feel investors should wait since a correction in gold prices is round the corner.

Gold ETFs are open-ended mutual fund schemes that invest the money collected from investors in standard gold bullion. Gold ETFs are traded in exchanges and each unit of gold ETF is equivalent to 1 gm of gold.

The soaring gold prices, mainly on account of uncertainty in global economic recovery and stock market volatility, have made Gold ETFs more attractive for investors.

``Investors should go slowly in investing in gold ETFs as the market is waiting for some correction to happen,`` Kotak AMC`s Head (Products) Lakshmi Iyer said.
``Gold has seen a huge run-up so far which suggests that whenever there is some correction, one should put 5%-10% of the overall portfolio in gold ETFs with a long term horizon,`` Iyer added.

As per data from Association of Mutual Funds of India (AMFI) assets under management of Gold ETFs rose 15.5% to Rs 18.37 billion in May compared to Rs 15.90 billion in March.

Value Research CEO Dhirendra Kumar said with gold prices touching new highs, the real consumption has disappeared and there is lot of volatility in the market.

``One should stay away from gold ETFs since its scale of business is too small in India and there are other places like equities and mutual funds where you can invest,`` he noted.

On the other hand, soaring gold prices have also resulted in redemption pressure on Gold ETFs. In May, these funds saw a net outflow of Rs 60 million, as many investors booked profits.

Last month, Gold ETFs witnessed an inflow of Rs 800 million while the outflow stood at Rs 860 million.

According to Religare Commodities President Jayant Manglik, Gold ETFs in the country are doing extremely well and as much as 10% returns can be expected from these funds in the next months.

``Gold ETFs move in line with the gold prices. The immediate future of investment in gold ETFs is quite positive. There is financial insecurity across the globe... In such a scenario gold ETFs are the best place to be,`` Manglik said.

In recent months, gold prices touched many record highs. In May, it had touched a high of Rs 18,629 a 10 grams, while in the international market it went up to USD 1,248.55 an ounce (28.35 grams).
Bombay Bullion Association data shows that gold imports declined by over 50% to 17 tons in May as compared to 34.2 tons in April due to surge in gold prices.

The surge in prices internationally has been triggered by higher demand in European markets in the wake of debt crisis that has weakened euro as well as concerns about global economic recovery.

TRADING RULES FOR DAY TRADERS

  • Never risk more than 10% of your trading capital in a single trade.
  • Always use stop-loss orders.
  • Never overtrade.
  • Never let a profit run into a loss.
  • Don 't enter a trade if you are unsure of the trend. Never buck the trend.
  • When in doubt, get out, and don't get in when in doubt.
  • Only trade active markets.
  • Distribute your risk equally among different markets.
  • Never limit your orders. Trade at the market.
  • Don't close trades without a good reason.
  • Extra monies from successful trades should be placed in a separate account.
  • Never trade to scalp a profit.
  • Never average a loss.
  • Never get out of the market because you have lost patience or get in because you are anxious from waiting.
  • Avoid taking small profits and large losses.
  • Never cancel a stop loss after you have placed the trade.
  • Avoid getting in and out of the market too often.
  • Be willing to make money from both sides of the market.
  • Never buy or sell just because the price is low or high.
  • Pyramiding should be accomplished once it has crossed resistance levels and broken zones of distribution.
  • Pyramid issues that have a strong trend.
  • Never hedge a losing position.
  • Never change your position without a good reason.
  • Avoid trading after long periods of success or failure.
  • Don't try to guess tops or bottoms.
  • Don't follow a blind man's advice.
  • Reduce trading after the first loss; never increase.
  • Avoid getting in wrong and out wrong; or getting in right and out wrong. This is making a double mistake.